Showing posts with label fathers' rights.child abuse.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fathers' rights.child abuse.. Show all posts

Friday, 20 November 2009

Canada News Centre - MESSAGE - International Children's Rights Day

Canada News Centre - MESSAGE - International Children's Rights Day

A must read. This intelligent ,educated human who speaks and writes with comprehension and empathy; should be more widely heard and read. (as if there were time !)

My opinions on children's rights, are more narrow in scope- sort of. My concern is in the area of separation and divorce. Specifically -those divorces which are called "high conflict".
What I have learned:
The majority of divorces are settled- often via mediation if needed- . The "rights" of all parties seem - protected. It is the divorces where one party was in fact, abusing the wife and children. The divorces where there is a constant unremitting series of court appearances to- obtain joint or shared custody-or, in cases of -abusers further on the continuum of abuse - the quest for total custody.These are the cases where the rights of the children are NEVER considered.The constant turmoil is, in itself,an abuse.
Who are abusers ? They can be anyone- from any walk of life. One constant is: they are predominately male.

Has there been an -upsurge of these cases ? (go back 25 years) Yes. It coincides rather neatly with the changes governments made- that the non-custodial parent absolutely must pay child support.(governments made these changes in an attempt to reduce welfare rolls- the number of mothers with children-on welfare. It was not altuism.

There is also a coincidental (? )increase in the noise made by some fathers' rights groups as well as drum beating by proponents of that pro-pediphile idea- pas- pa ,or just alienation- as some of the snake oil salesmen like to call it now. (too many know the provenance of these ideas)

And- of course- if one can "prove" alienation- there are some waiting anxiously in the wings- to provide "therapy" to- un alienate the child ! Yeah. Right.

I am very clear on how I see all of THAT. And my opinion is not acceptable in writing -on a blog. It has to do with greed. And no ethics.

Did others notice that some people now are screeching FOR "automatic" shared parenting ? At the same time the Australian government is revising its practice of "equal" parenting- of the last six ? years. Too many deaths of mothers and children. The final straw was little Darcy Freeman. Dear old dad stopped his vehicle on a bridge-plucked the tiny girl out and threw her off the bridge. In front of two young sons. Another funeral.

Do these children enjoy their basic human rights ? Did they ? There are dozens of similar cases,ending in death. In every case, examined AFTER the fact- (deaths) there was found a series of clear warnings- of abusive and dangerous behavior. A "psychologist" or social worker easily or purposefully "misses" these signals- and- the deaths continue.

Is this what the silent majority wishes for Canada ?????

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Inventor of Abusive Fake Anonymummies Site, Mark K. Godbey, Due to Court Again in 10 Year Legal Abuse of Ex-Wife « Very Bad Daddies

Inventor of Abusive Fake Anonymummies Site, Mark K. Godbey, Due to Court Again in 10 Year Legal Abuse of Ex-Wife « Very Bad Daddies


For all the decent and semi-decent humans out there ,who have NO idea what an abuser can "do" to continue abusing after separation or divorce : glance at THIS one example of abusive behavior that is repeated at least weekly, across North America. Lots of others- end with murder of the mother and/or the children. The laws , courts and social service systems have NOT "caught up" with the ugly reality of what happens in so many divorces and separations. Even ONE , is too many-. These - types of "fathers" are the ones who - -flock to pas/pa/shared/equal parenting types. The lawyers and others who promote pas/pa/equal parenting etc. nonsense, are at the very least, guilty by association. They promote these ridiculous theories and therapies and "tools" in the courts, to aid abusers. The 98% or so people who divorce WITHOUT all this continued abuse, negotiate reasonable settlements without abusing their children and (the usual) the mothers of these children.

There are abusers in every nation. In Canada, there are some abusers who abuse like this- and the advocates of abuse, who actively promote pas/pa/equal parenting etc.
I am re-posting this -truth- (Godbey's cases) to show anyone who reads this blog- the kind of behavior that abusers and their supporters advocate. A criminal is a criminal;- unless he is married- it would seem ! Thank goodness it is only a few who are criminally inclined- and I include people who push therapy nonsense. The child abuse called pas/pa- does everyone KNOW that these scurrilous ideas were developed by a pro-pedophile ? Birds of a feather F LOCK together.

Monday, 26 October 2009

Clarification

From time to time, I will read a text by a supposed fathers' rights group- or a supporter.. I have yet to comprehend any of the texts. (and there seem to be a lot- ) None of the statistics quoted turn out to be correct- and/or are wildly slanted to the writer's point of view. Mostly, I just don't bother. I am otherwise occupied reading the plethora of reports on children and frequently their mothers, killed by - -fathers.

Too much horrendous destruction. Too many mothers losing custody of cherished children, to an abuser-often a child rapist./ sexual abuser as well as being a wife beater.

However- I now think I have discovered the reason for my inability to understand these fathers' rights texts. It is because they are writing in newspeak- a la George Orwell. In newspeak, mothers and children would be UNPERSONS, - their crimes having been to report their abuses ! Except- it is a dialect version of newspeak- which I presume should called FRIVELSPEAK. That incorporates both aspects of the texts I have read ; namely fathers rights (as seen by some) and - drivel.

I hope this explanation will help others decode the articles and letters which bore (two senses of the word) their way around the Internet !

http://www.newspeakdictionary.com