Showing posts with label children's rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children's rights. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

Zerbisias: My Canada includes war, environmental degradation and lost causes - thestar.com

Zerbisias: My Canada includes war, environmental degradation and lost causes - thestar.com


Now this is well worth reading. I heard Robert Fowler and applauded what he said. I also just listened to Hilary Clinton talk with George (sorry- not even going to TRY to spell the name tonight -) about human rights and security -public security issues. Excellent. She gets full marks for her comments. Top notch. George gets top marks for having asked the pertinent questions !

Saturday, 26 December 2009

Mad Monopoly

Keep hearing about some poor child - brought back to the U.S.- Goldman. It all strikes me as like some kind of Monopoly game for the insane or just downright angry. It sounds like- everyone is talking about property rights- after all- that IS what laws are founded on- so was marriage, come to think of it - -But- Monopoly- it fits. Roll the dice- get born. Move a couple of years, go to Brazil with Mummy and stay with family. Roll the dice, get new baby (step) sister. oh oh- penalty- lose your mother. You may move along for a year or so on the same streets and with the same buildings,houses,schools and family. Dice roll- oh- you thought it was your turn ? No- you only get to -try- when you are 18 or older - -This dice roll- you lose -big time- known family, houses,school,friends etc.- country- language- you get to dump it all and go to another Monopoly game in another country.  I wonder who wins at this game - -anyone ? No-one ?

Seems to me I saw a brief mention a ways back- about a Jean Paul Lacombe- ILLEGALLY kidnapped . Will he get to play Monopoly too ?

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

The McGill Tribune - OFF THE BOARD: The fight for men's rights

The McGill Tribune - OFF THE BOARD: The fight for men's rights

An excellent,short text which is most balanced in its reasoning. For that reason alone (it is SANE ! ) , it will probably incite the familiar rage experienced by the few - -males - -who seem to have hours and hours of time to rant invented statistics. Or -perhaps they just (these few) cannot read any texts that contain the word "woman" or "mother" without working themselves into a frenzy. Sad really. Many men I have met are distressed and often embarrassed by the mouthings of the few who seem ill equipped to function in a society that is struggling to evolve beyond the "women and children are chattel" belief.

Friday, 20 November 2009

Canada News Centre - MESSAGE - International Children's Rights Day

Canada News Centre - MESSAGE - International Children's Rights Day

A must read. This intelligent ,educated human who speaks and writes with comprehension and empathy; should be more widely heard and read. (as if there were time !)

My opinions on children's rights, are more narrow in scope- sort of. My concern is in the area of separation and divorce. Specifically -those divorces which are called "high conflict".
What I have learned:
The majority of divorces are settled- often via mediation if needed- . The "rights" of all parties seem - protected. It is the divorces where one party was in fact, abusing the wife and children. The divorces where there is a constant unremitting series of court appearances to- obtain joint or shared custody-or, in cases of -abusers further on the continuum of abuse - the quest for total custody.These are the cases where the rights of the children are NEVER considered.The constant turmoil is, in itself,an abuse.
Who are abusers ? They can be anyone- from any walk of life. One constant is: they are predominately male.

Has there been an -upsurge of these cases ? (go back 25 years) Yes. It coincides rather neatly with the changes governments made- that the non-custodial parent absolutely must pay child support.(governments made these changes in an attempt to reduce welfare rolls- the number of mothers with children-on welfare. It was not altuism.

There is also a coincidental (? )increase in the noise made by some fathers' rights groups as well as drum beating by proponents of that pro-pediphile idea- pas- pa ,or just alienation- as some of the snake oil salesmen like to call it now. (too many know the provenance of these ideas)

And- of course- if one can "prove" alienation- there are some waiting anxiously in the wings- to provide "therapy" to- un alienate the child ! Yeah. Right.

I am very clear on how I see all of THAT. And my opinion is not acceptable in writing -on a blog. It has to do with greed. And no ethics.

Did others notice that some people now are screeching FOR "automatic" shared parenting ? At the same time the Australian government is revising its practice of "equal" parenting- of the last six ? years. Too many deaths of mothers and children. The final straw was little Darcy Freeman. Dear old dad stopped his vehicle on a bridge-plucked the tiny girl out and threw her off the bridge. In front of two young sons. Another funeral.

Do these children enjoy their basic human rights ? Did they ? There are dozens of similar cases,ending in death. In every case, examined AFTER the fact- (deaths) there was found a series of clear warnings- of abusive and dangerous behavior. A "psychologist" or social worker easily or purposefully "misses" these signals- and- the deaths continue.

Is this what the silent majority wishes for Canada ?????

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

FATHER REFUSES TO VISIT DAUGHTER. . .: Father Refuses visitation . . .

FATHER REFUSES TO VISIT DAUGHTER. . .: Father Refuses visitation . . .


Ohhhhh - you thought it was FINISHED ???? It never is , with an abuser.

More of the continuing saga of Lorraine Tipton, the - -um - -the - "father, Craig Hensberger and the child , M. This is what abusers DO- they abuse. No surprise there. Even tv land knows THAT. Ever see : Criminal Minds, CSI, NCIS, SVU,Flashpoint- , for example ?

If all sorts of tv watchers, a whole lot of mothers, a great many men etc. etc. -know this- that abusers just- abuse- WHY cannot a few psychologists,a few lawyers, a few- lawmakers etc. - NOT ? How out of it can one be ????? Or- is it possible ? Abusers also ? Or- secretly wanting to be ? Living vicariously ? What ?

How can some presumably mildly intelligent people- support and promote abuse ???

Does the general public KNOW that pedophiles and fathers' rights sites , EXPLAIN how to "get" your- child, ex-wife- ex-girlfriend etc. ? Used to be that it was written in certain types of magazines- now it is written on the Internet - -

Monday, 31 August 2009

Chainsaw the Couch

With certain tactics having failed,some groups are now thumping the equal or shared parenting drum. The one that has so miserably failed in Australia. There will be academic discourses, dangerous discourses, silly discourses etc. ad nauseum. I might as well add my voice to the noise before the decibel level becomes excrutiating.

A while back, I read a funny and true saga of a "conflicted" divorce. The two adults (?) involved decided to split everything 50/50- or -a court ordered it. Can't remember. In any case- one sealed off half of the house-moved all clothing etc. I seem to remember it was the husband-but- no matter. Then, he came "home " one day- to find his ex wife sawing the couch in half with a chainsaw. Well- everything got divided 50/50. No-one wrote about how the couch was doing - - -
That is basically my opinion on equal or shared parenting. There's more but- I am sure someone more erudite than I, will say it.