Inventor of Abusive Fake Anonymummies Site, Mark K. Godbey, Due to Court Again in 10 Year Legal Abuse of Ex-Wife « Very Bad Daddies

Inventor of Abusive Fake Anonymummies Site, Mark K. Godbey, Due to Court Again in 10 Year Legal Abuse of Ex-Wife « Very Bad Daddies


For all the decent and semi-decent humans out there ,who have NO idea what an abuser can "do" to continue abusing after separation or divorce : glance at THIS one example of abusive behavior that is repeated at least weekly, across North America. Lots of others- end with murder of the mother and/or the children. The laws , courts and social service systems have NOT "caught up" with the ugly reality of what happens in so many divorces and separations. Even ONE , is too many-. These - types of "fathers" are the ones who - -flock to pas/pa/shared/equal parenting types. The lawyers and others who promote pas/pa/equal parenting etc. nonsense, are at the very least, guilty by association. They promote these ridiculous theories and therapies and "tools" in the courts, to aid abusers. The 98% or so people who divorce WITHOUT all this continued abuse, negotiate reasonable settlements without abusing their children and (the usual) the mothers of these children.

There are abusers in every nation. In Canada, there are some abusers who abuse like this- and the advocates of abuse, who actively promote pas/pa/equal parenting etc.
I am re-posting this -truth- (Godbey's cases) to show anyone who reads this blog- the kind of behavior that abusers and their supporters advocate. A criminal is a criminal;- unless he is married- it would seem ! Thank goodness it is only a few who are criminally inclined- and I include people who push therapy nonsense. The child abuse called pas/pa- does everyone KNOW that these scurrilous ideas were developed by a pro-pedophile ? Birds of a feather F LOCK together.

Chainsaw the Couch

With certain tactics having failed,some groups are now thumping the equal or shared parenting drum. The one that has so miserably failed in Australia. There will be academic discourses, dangerous discourses, silly discourses etc. ad nauseum. I might as well add my voice to the noise before the decibel level becomes excrutiating.

A while back, I read a funny and true saga of a "conflicted" divorce. The two adults (?) involved decided to split everything 50/50- or -a court ordered it. Can't remember. In any case- one sealed off half of the house-moved all clothing etc. I seem to remember it was the husband-but- no matter. Then, he came "home " one day- to find his ex wife sawing the couch in half with a chainsaw. Well- everything got divided 50/50. No-one wrote about how the couch was doing - - -
That is basically my opinion on equal or shared parenting. There's more but- I am sure someone more erudite than I, will say it.

Indecent Proposals

In the bipolar world of divorce legislation, the pendulum swings wildly between extremes of the presumption of mothering being a natural priority, as it is in the rest of nature , and an obsession with adult "rights" - which usually entails the concept of ownership of chattel and frequently results in abusive men gaining substantial access or full custody of hapless children.



As this pendulum swings, it sometimes delivers a lethal whack to the children who are in its trajectory.



Most divorces are finalized in a relatively reasonable manner. Probably because more people are semi-decent, than not. The small percentage of all divorces that are bizarrely named "high conflict" , are played out by those who appear incapable of decent reason. Most often, it is abusive men who contest divorces and seek custody. Indeed, the very act of engaging in perpetual litigation, is abusive.



This sub-group , having had some limited success (i.e. in getting their very own victims) in supporting pro -pedophilic theories like PAS and PA, are now considering once more banging the drum of "equal parenting". Too many legislators and others are learning the destructive outcomes of using PAS type theories - witness the recent amendments passed in California. So, the sub group are switching tactics.Conveniently, as usual, the well being of children does not count. Only the imposition of what they call equal parenting time.



In their proposed surreal world, 50% of time would be spent with the parent who never before spent that amount of time with the children , and the increased time would be taken from the primary care-taker. Which means, of course, more time for the children AWAY from what is often a protective parent, and increased time or total control for the abuser.



In that otherworld, a top grade diamond is the same as a counterfeit diamond - because - at a cursory glance, they look the same.



WHACK